• Users Online: 166
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
REVIEW ARTICLE
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 28  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 115-119

Increasing the flap viability: Truth or myth?


1 Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, Izmir Katip Celebi University, Izmir, Turkey
2 Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Kartal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Ersin Aksam
Izmir Katip Celebi University, Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, Plastic Surgery Department, Karabaglar, Izmir
Turkey
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/tjps.tjps_30_19

Get Permissions

Introduction: One question has led us to conduct this study: “Can we increase skin flap viability?” We found many published articles on flap viability in every journal about reconstructive surgery. However, we did not encounter any study on human subjects. The aim of this study is to evaluate the articles that have been published on flap viability in the last 10 years, to find potential agents or methods that can be used for flaps performed on humans. Materials and Methods: English articles published between 2008 and 2017 in the PubMed database were evaluated. The search terms used for this review included “flap viability” and “flap survival.” Details about the test subjects, sample sizes, and interventions and the effects on flap viability were recorded for each study. Results: A total of 995 articles were evaluated according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria; 231 studies were then included in the study and 764 were excluded from the study. No previous study on human subjects was encountered. An increase of flap viability was detected in 209 studies (90.5%), and a decrease was detected in 16 studies (6.9%). Six studies reported no effect on flap viability (2.6%). Conclusion: Although it is inevitable that animal experiments will be undertaken before human experiments, when researchers are planning animal experiments, they should consider how well the methods used can be adapted for human beings. We recommend planning human clinical trials with physical methods such as extracorporeal shockwave therapy, laser therapies, and the chemical agent botulinum toxin A. Physical methods are locally effective methods, and their side effects are well known.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed150    
    Printed14    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded36    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal