• Users Online: 1073
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 28  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 33-37

Importance and necessity of surgical combinations in the correction of prominent ears for natural and long-lasting results


Private Aesthetic, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Clinic, Bursa, Turkey

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Ayhan Okumus
Plastic Surgery Office, Ilknur Street, Bulvar 224 1/B - 10, Ihsaniye, Nilufer, Bursa
Turkey
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/tjps.tjps_18_19

Get Permissions

Introduction: Many surgical methods are defined to correct prominent ears, with the most common being external auditory canal anomaly. Trying to treat cases where different anatomic structures coexist in the anomaly increases the risk of additional surgical intervention or causes an unnatural appearance. In this study, it was demonstrated that application of varying surgical combinations depending on the anatomic components which cause prominent ears would produce natural and long-lasting results. Materials and Methods: Seventy-one patients, with antihelix tube development defect, conchal hypertrophy, or both, were operated in our clinic between 2004 and 2018 (age range: 6–43 years, 42 females and 29 males). Four different methods were employed, consisting of postauricular skin excision of 0.5–1.5 cm, posterior abrasion of the antihelix and shaping with Mustarde sutures, semilunar excision from the large and mispositioned concha and connecting the ends before securing loosely to the mastoid fascia, and securing the dermo-perichondrial flap to the mastoid fascia. Three different surgical combinations were utilized on three patient groups with antihelix formation defect, concha hypertrophy, or both. Results: Patients were followed up for 2 years on an average, 6 months at minimum. No major complications were encountered except for one patient who had an opening of the upper pole, while another had it on both sides. All patients stated their satisfaction with the result. Conclusion: The purpose of prominent ear treatment should not only be formation of the antihelix or bringing the ear closer to head.Different problems can be solved separately with combined treatment, and more natural and lasting results can be obtained.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed113    
    Printed10    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded27    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal